From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fultz v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Dec 28, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:05cv175-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Dec. 28, 2006)

Summary

finding sentencing transcript did not constitute "newly discovered evidence"

Summary of this case from Hernandez v. United States

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:05cv175-MHT (WO).

December 28, 2006


OPINION


Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, petitioner filed this habeas-corpus case. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the habeas-corpus request be denied as time-barred. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.


Summaries of

Fultz v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Dec 28, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:05cv175-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Dec. 28, 2006)

finding sentencing transcript did not constitute "newly discovered evidence"

Summary of this case from Hernandez v. United States

sentencing transcript is not "newly discovered evidence" and in any event, the movant was present at the hearing and thus aware of the facts supporting her claim

Summary of this case from Smith v. United States

sentencing transcript is not "newly discovered evidence" and in any event, the movant was present at the hearing and thus was aware of the facts supporting her claim

Summary of this case from Smith v. United States
Case details for

Fultz v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:LaTASHA FULTZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Dec 28, 2006

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:05cv175-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Dec. 28, 2006)

Citing Cases

Smith v. United States

He knew or should have known the factual basis for his claim at that time, not when he obtained a copy of the…

Smith v. United States

" See, e.g., Rinaldi v. Sniezek, 302 F.App'x 125, 2008 WL 5179368 (3rd Cir.. December 11, 2008) (stating that…