However, claims concerning an inmate's conditions of confinement are not proper for review in a Section 2255 motion. See, e.g., Fulton v. United States, Criminal Indictment No. 1:10-CR-0336-RWS-1, Civil File No. 1:11-CV-0801-RWS, 2011 WL 1262166, at *2 (N.D. Ga. Mar. 30, 2011) (noting that Section 2255 is not available to challenge conditions of confinement); Alvarado v. United States, Nos. 08cv0631-LAB, 06cr1195, 2008 WL 5111326, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2008) ("[N]either a motion pursuant to § 3582 nor a petition under § 2255 is the proper method of challenging conditions of confinement."); Guidice v. United States, No. 89-CV-1259, 1989 WL 80046, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 7, 1989) (citing United States v. Huss, 520 F.2d 598 (2d Cir. 1975)).