From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fulton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 25, 2014
425 S.W.3d 221 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. WD 76117.

2014-03-25

Prentiss R. FULTON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clay County, Larry D. Harman, Judge. Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clay County, Larry D. Harman, Judge.
Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Two: GARY D. WITT, Presiding Judge, LISA WHITE HARDWICK and ALOK AHUJA, Judges.

Order


PER CURIAM.

Prentiss R. Fulton, Jr., appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He contends that the motion court erred in failing to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on all of the claims raised in his amended motion, and he asks that we reverse and remand the judgment to the motion court with instructions to address all of his claims. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provide to the parties, we find no error and affirm the post-conviction judgment. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Fulton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 25, 2014
425 S.W.3d 221 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Fulton v. State

Case Details

Full title:Prentiss R. FULTON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Mar 25, 2014

Citations

425 S.W.3d 221 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)