From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fulton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 16, 2006
192 S.W.3d 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. ED 86914.

May 16, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Donald L. McCullin, Judge.

Edward Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Roger Johnson — co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.


ORDER


Eric Fulton (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to move to suppress or objecting to the victim's identification of Movant. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. 2005, unless otherwise indicated.


Summaries of

Fulton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 16, 2006
192 S.W.3d 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Fulton v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eric FULTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: May 16, 2006

Citations

192 S.W.3d 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Fulton v. Purkett

The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the circuit court's decision. (Id., Ex. 10); Fulton v. State, 192…