From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fulton v. City of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 17, 2011
No. 10 Civ. 425 (RJS) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. 10 Civ. 425 (RJS) (HBP)

10-17-2011

TYRONE FULTON, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al„ Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN. District Judge:

Pro se Plaintiff Tyrone Fulton filed his Complaint on January 19, 2010, advancing claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising out of allegedly negligent dental care he received while he was incarcerated at the New York City Department of Corrections Facility at Rikers Island. By Order dated January 27, 2010, this matter was referred to the Honorable Henry B. Pitman, Magistrate Judge, for general pre-trial purposes and dispositive motions requiring a report and recommendation.

On July 14, 2011, Judge Pitman issued a Report and Recommendation (the "Report"), in which he sua sponte recommended that "this action be dismissed on the ground that plaintiff has not completed service of the summons and complaint within the time permitted by Rule 4(m) [of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure]." (Doc. No. 9 at 2.) In the Report, Judge Pitman advised the parties that failure to file timely objections to the Report would constitute a waiver of those objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party has filed objections to the Report, and the time to do so has expired. Cf, Frank v. Johnson, 968 F,2d 298 (2d Cir. 1993).

When no objections to a report and recommendation are made, the Court may adopt the report if there is no clear error on the face of the record. Adee Motor Cars, LLC v. Amato, 388 F. Supp. 2d 250, 253 (S.D.N.Y. 2005); La Torres v. Walker, 216 F. Supp. 2d 157, 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). After reviewing the record, the Court finds that Judge Pitman's Report is not facially erroneous. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety, and for the reasons set forth therein, dismisses the Complaint as to all Defendants without prejudice to renewal. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 17, 2011

New York, New York

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
A copy of this Order has been mailed to:

Tyrone Fulton

2015 Madison Avenue

New York, NY 10035


Summaries of

Fulton v. City of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 17, 2011
No. 10 Civ. 425 (RJS) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Fulton v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE FULTON, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al„ Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

No. 10 Civ. 425 (RJS) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2011)