Opinion
No. 05-06-00066-CR
Opinion Filed June 5, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F04-58079-N. Affirmed.
Before Justices WRIGHT, MOSELEY, and LANG.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Roy Joseph Fulps pleaded guilty to attempted sexual assault. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court deferred adjudicating guilt, placed appellant on five years' community supervision, and assessed a $2500 fine. The State later moved to adjudicated guilt alleging appellant violated nine conditions of supervision. Following a hearing, the trial court adjudicated appellant guilty and sentenced him to ten years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response, but appellant did not file a response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.