From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fullman v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 17, 2023
Civil Action 22-4282 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 17, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-4282

10-17-2023

ANDREW FULLMAN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE COMMISSIONER DANIELLE OUTLAW, CHARLES KING, SGT. CUNNINGHAM, MICHAEL GORMLEY, LAWRENCE SAMUEL KRASNER, and JOHN DOE, Defendants.


ORDER

WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

AND NOW, this 17th day of October, 2023, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff Andrew Fullman's Amended Complaint (ECF Nos. 45 and 46) and all responses thereto (ECF No. 58), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED and Fullman's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant referred to in the caption as “John Doe” is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ]

See Hallett v, Doe, Nov. 5, 2019, 2019 WL 5722005 (E.D.Pa. 2019)

Accordingly, Fullman's Motion for Reconsideration regarding his Motion for Discovery (ECF No. 64) is DENIED as MOOT.

The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE this matter and mark it CLOSED.


Summaries of

Fullman v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 17, 2023
Civil Action 22-4282 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Fullman v. City of Philadelphia

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW FULLMAN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE COMMISSIONER…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 17, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 22-4282 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 17, 2023)