From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fuller v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sep 27, 2011
361 S.W.3d 22 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. WD 72705.

2011-09-27

George FULLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Joel F. May, Judge.Ronald E. Partee, for Appellant. Karen L. Kramer, for Respondent.


Supreme Court Denied Nov. 1, 2011.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Joel F. May, Judge.Ronald E. Partee, for Appellant. Karen L. Kramer, for Respondent.

Before Division Three: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, ALOK AHUJA, Judge and KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

George Fuller appeals from the motion court's denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction case. On appeal, Fuller claims that he was entitled to reopen the Rule 29.15 proceedings because he was abandoned by counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Fuller v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sep 27, 2011
361 S.W.3d 22 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Fuller v. State

Case Details

Full title:George FULLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Sep 27, 2011

Citations

361 S.W.3d 22 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

Fuller v. State

We thereafter affirmed the motion court in a per curium order. Fuller v. State, 361 S.W.3d 22 (Mo.App.…

Fuller v. State

We thereafter affirmed the motion court in a per curium order. Fuller v. State, 361 S.W.3d 22 (Mo.App.…