From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fuller v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Jan 29, 1964
196 N.E.2d 188 (Mass. 1964)

Opinion

January 29, 1964.

Richard I. Gottlieb, for the plaintiff, submitted a brief.

Charles F. Choate for the defendant.


Exceptions overruled. The evidence most favorable to the plaintiff is that at 6:15 P.M. on a cold and windy day during a heavy snow storm he entered the defendant's Devonshire Street station in Boston, descended the steps while holding onto the right handrail, and had reached the third or fourth step from the bottom when he stepped on an object which felt like "half a hard rubber ball," but appeared to be ice under snow. He fell and was injured. After a verdict for the plaintiff, the judge under leave reserved entered a verdict for the defendant. There was no error. Whatever the substance may have been, there was no evidence that it had been on the step long enough so that the employees of the defendant, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have discovered it and removed it. Reardon v. Boston Elev. Ry. 311 Mass. 228, 230, and cases cited.


Summaries of

Fuller v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Jan 29, 1964
196 N.E.2d 188 (Mass. 1964)
Case details for

Fuller v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD M. FULLER vs. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Jan 29, 1964

Citations

196 N.E.2d 188 (Mass. 1964)
346 Mass. 782