From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. City of Santa Fe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Sep 19, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-00309 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 19, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-00309

09-19-2018

GEORGE WEST and BRADY FULLER Plaintiffs. v. CITY OF SANTA FE, TEXAS and CITY OF HITCHCOCK, TEXAS Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION & SEVERING CASES

Pending before the Court is the August 16, 2018 Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison. Defendant City of Hitchcock's Opposed Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 54) and Defendants' Opposed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Claims (Dkt. 16) were referred to Judge Edison. (Dkts. 57, 59). On August 16, 2018, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation recommending that that the Defendant City of Hitchcock's Opposed Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 54) and Defendants' Opposed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Claims (Dkt. 16) be DENIED.

On August 30, 2018, Defendants filed their Objections (Dkts. 70, 71). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court is required to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the [magistrate judge's] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection [has been] made." After conducting this de novo review, the Court may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id.; see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

The Court has carefully reviewed the Objections; the Memorandum and Recommendation; the pleadings; and the briefing and arguments of the parties.

The Court ACCEPTS Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation and ADOPTS it as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that:

(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court;

(2) Defendant City of Hitchcock's Opposed Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 54) is DENIED; and;

(3) Defendants' Opposed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Claims (Dkt. 16) is DENIED.

The Court also ORDERS that this case is SEVERED into two separate lawsuits. The first lawsuit, which will carry this case number, will consist of George West's claims against Defendant City of Hitchcock, Texas. The second lawsuit will carry a case number assigned by the District Clerk, and will consist of Brady Fuller's claims against Defendant City of Santa Fe, Texas.

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED and ENTERED this 19th day of September, 2018.

/s/_________

GEORGE C. HANKS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

West v. City of Santa Fe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Sep 19, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-00309 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 19, 2018)
Case details for

West v. City of Santa Fe

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE WEST and BRADY FULLER Plaintiffs. v. CITY OF SANTA FE, TEXAS and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

Date published: Sep 19, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-00309 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 19, 2018)