Opinion
1:21CV302
09-14-2021
ORDER
LORETTA C. BIGGS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on August 5, 2021, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 9, 10). Plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommendation. (ECF No. 11).
The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's document entitled, “Objections to Orders and Recommendations Entry in Prejudice, Miscarriage of Justice, Obstruction, Retaliation Violations Prohibited 28 C.F.R. § 35.104, 4th Am. U.S.C.A., 1st Am. U.S.C.A., 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101 et. Seq., ” construed as a motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b), (ECF No 8), is DENIED.