From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fulgham v. Fulgham

Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 10, 1964
392 P.2d 771 (Or. 1964)

Opinion

Argued May 20, 1964

Affirmed June 10, 1964

Appeal from Circuit Court, Yamhill County.

ROBERT C. BELLONI, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

H.W. Devlin, McMinnville, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Cummins Devlin, McMinnville.

Bruce W. Williams, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Williams Skopil and Al J. Laue, Salem.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and GOODWIN, Justices.


Defendant-husband was awarded custody of the children in this divorce proceeding. Plaintiff appeals from that part of the decree.

The trial court found that it was more likely that the father would devote more personal attention to the children than would the mother. The evidence supports the trial court's decision.

We affirm.


Summaries of

Fulgham v. Fulgham

Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 10, 1964
392 P.2d 771 (Or. 1964)
Case details for

Fulgham v. Fulgham

Case Details

Full title:FULGHAM v. FULGHAM

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jun 10, 1964

Citations

392 P.2d 771 (Or. 1964)
392 P.2d 771

Citing Cases

Starlin v. Love

Code 1923, § 5742; Gen.Acts 1931, p. 649; Johnston v. Pierson, 229 Ala. 85, 156 So. 695; Bell v. Fulgham, 202…

Brown v. Brown

Under section 2520 of the Code of 1907, the widow, if a fit person, is the one who is first entitled to…