From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fuhrmann v. C&J Gray Invs. Partners, Ltd.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
May 15, 2014
No. 05-14-00298-CV (Tex. App. May. 15, 2014)

Opinion

No. 05-14-00298-CV

05-15-2014

TOBY M. FUHRMANN, BRIDGETT L. KIRKPATRICK, KAREN E. DERRICK, AND MELVIN MCDANIEL, Appellants v. C & J GRAY INVESTMENTS PARTNERS, LTD., Appellee


On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-13-0203


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Brown

Opinion by Justice Myers

In a letter dated April 2, 2014, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal because it did not appear there was a final judgment. We requested that appellants file a letter brief addressing our concern and gave appellee an opportunity to respond. Appellants filed a jurisdictional brief. Appellee did not respond.

Generally, this Court has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A final judgment is one that disposes of all pending parties and claims. See id.

Appellee sued appellants and Speir Investments, Ltd. for declaratory judgment in relation to mineral interests and attorney's fees. Appellants filed counterclaims for declaratory judgment and attorney's fees. Appellee filed a motion for partial summary judgment on its declaratory judgment claim. The order appealed from grants appellee's motion for partial summary judgment. The order states "[t]he Court reserves the right to make further orders not specifically addressed herein should additional issues later arise." The order does not dispose of appellee's claim for attorney's fees or the appellants' counterclaims. In their jurisdictional brief, appellants state that they "concur with the Court's initial impression that the order is not a final judgment.

Speir Investments, Ltd. is not a party to this appeal.

Because the trial court's order does not disposes of all claims, the judgment is not final and this Court lacks jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

__________

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
140298F.P05

JUDGMENT

TOBY M. FUHRMANN, BRIDGETT L.
KIRKPATRICK, KAREN E. DERRICK,
AND MELVIN MCDANIEL, Appellants

V. C & J GRAY INVESTMENTS
PARTNERS, LTD., Appellee
No. 05-14-00298-CV

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District

Court, Grayson County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. CV-13-0203.

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers.

Justices Lang and Brown, participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, C & J GRAY INVESTMENTS PARTNERS, LTD., recover its costs of this appeal from appellants, TOBY M. FUHRMANN, BRIDGETT L. KIRKPATRICK, KAREN E. DERRICK, AND MELVIN MCDANIEL.

__________

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Fuhrmann v. C&J Gray Invs. Partners, Ltd.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
May 15, 2014
No. 05-14-00298-CV (Tex. App. May. 15, 2014)
Case details for

Fuhrmann v. C&J Gray Invs. Partners, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:TOBY M. FUHRMANN, BRIDGETT L. KIRKPATRICK, KAREN E. DERRICK, AND MELVIN…

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: May 15, 2014

Citations

No. 05-14-00298-CV (Tex. App. May. 15, 2014)

Citing Cases

Fuhrmann v. C & J Gray Invs. Partners, Ltd.

We dismissed their appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fuhrmann v. C & J Gray Invs. Partners, Ltd. (Fuhrmann…