From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fugitt v. Unknown Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Mar 26, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-590 (W.D. La. Mar. 26, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-590

03-26-2015

STEVEN FUGITT, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, Respondent.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 5] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law,

IT IS ORDERED that the petitioner's Complaint [Doc. 1] be and hereby is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, because the court lacks jurisdiction to consider these claims.

Lake Charles, Louisiana, this 26 day of March, 2015.

/s/_________

PATRICIA MINALDI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Fugitt v. Unknown Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Mar 26, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-590 (W.D. La. Mar. 26, 2015)
Case details for

Fugitt v. Unknown Defendant

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN FUGITT, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Mar 26, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-590 (W.D. La. Mar. 26, 2015)