From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fugate v. New Mexico

U.S.
Mar 26, 1985
470 U.S. 904 (1985)

Summary

affirming by an equally divided Court

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Salerno

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO

No. 83-6663.

Argued February 19, 1985 Decided March 26, 1985

101 N.M. 58, 678 P.2d 686, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

J. Thomas Sullivan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Henry R. Quintero.

Paul Bardacke, Attorney General of New Mexico, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was Anthony Tupler, Assistant Attorney General.


The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.


Summaries of

Fugate v. New Mexico

U.S.
Mar 26, 1985
470 U.S. 904 (1985)

affirming by an equally divided Court

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Salerno
Case details for

Fugate v. New Mexico

Case Details

Full title:FUGATE v . NEW MEXICO

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 26, 1985

Citations

470 U.S. 904 (1985)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Salerno

[2] This issue has been raised before us twice in recent years without resolution. See Fugate v. New Mexico,…

State v. Rodriguez

State v. Padilla, 101 N.M. 58, 59, 678 P.2d 686, 687 (1984), aff'd by an equally divided Court sub nom.…