From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fuentes v. State

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Nov 14, 1991
598 A.2d 113 (R.I. 1991)

Opinion

No. 89-447-C.A.

November 14, 1991.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Providence County; Grande, Judge.

David Cicilline, Providence, for plaintiff.

James E. O'Neil, Atty. Gen., Jeffrey Greer, Asst. Atty. Gen., David Prior, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.


ORDER

This matter was before this court pursuant to an order issued to both parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily resolved. After reviewing memoranda submitted by the parties and after hearing counsel in oral argument, this court concludes that cause has not been shown.

This court is of the opinion that Samuel Fuentes failed to present any credible or competent evidence that defense counsel did not conduct an adequate investigation or failed to arrange interviews of certain witnesses. We believe the full test of the trial justice's decision clearly indicates that petitioner was not denied effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment.

The petitioner's post-conviction appeal is denied and dismissed. The judgment appealed from is affirmed and the case is remanded to the Superior Court.


Summaries of

Fuentes v. State

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Nov 14, 1991
598 A.2d 113 (R.I. 1991)
Case details for

Fuentes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Samuel FUENTES v. STATE of Rhode Island

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Nov 14, 1991

Citations

598 A.2d 113 (R.I. 1991)

Citing Cases

Fuentes v. State

Petitioner appealed the denial of that decision to the Supreme Court and the court affirmed. Fuentes v.…

Fuentes v. Rhode Island

State v. Fuentes, 433 A.2d 184, 192-93 (R.I. 1981); see Fuentes v. State, No. PM 85-4163, 1989 WL 1110574, at…