From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fue v. Biter

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug 4, 2016
835 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 12-55307

08-04-2016

Steven Pelesasa Fue, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Martin Biter, Warden, Respondent–Appellee.

Michael Tanaka, Deputy Federal Public Defender, FPDCA—Federal Public Defender's Office (Los Angeles), Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner–Appellant. Yun K. Lee, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA–Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent–Appellee.


Michael Tanaka, Deputy Federal Public Defender, FPDCA—Federal Public Defender's Office (Los Angeles), Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner–Appellant.

Yun K. Lee, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA–Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent–Appellee.

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Fue v. Biter

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug 4, 2016
835 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Fue v. Biter

Case Details

Full title:Steven Pelesasa Fue, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Martin Biter, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Aug 4, 2016

Citations

835 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 2016)