Summary
In Fuchslocher, the Ninth Circuit remanded a case to the District Court with directions to conduct a hearing on the merits to determine whether the court should grant a stay of deportation and to make such ruling before April 1, 1997, noting that: "The district court currently has jurisdiction" and citing Lalani.
Summary of this case from Caravantes v. I.N.S.Opinion
No. 96-17114
Submitted February 26, 1997 — San Francisco, California.
This panel unanimously agrees that this case is appropriate for submission without oral argument. Fed R. App. P. 34(a); Ninth Cir. R. 34-4.
Filed February 26, 1997
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding.
D.C. No. CV-96-02536-PGR
Before: REINHARDT, HALL, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This case is hereby removed from the calendar for March 6, 1997, in San Francisco, California, and deemed submitted without oral argument as of this date.
The case is remanded to the district court with instructions to conduct a hearing on the merits of whether the court should grant a stay of deportation and to make the ruling before April 1, 1997. The district court currently has jurisdiction. See Lalani v. Perryman, ___ F.3d ___, No. 96-2498, 1997 WL 24520 (7th Cir. Jan. 23, 1997).
Filed March 20, 1997
Appellant's emergency motion for immediate publication is GRANTED. The unpublished order filed February 26, 1997, shall be published immediately.