From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FSP STALLION 1 v. LUCE

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 19, 2011
2:08-CV-01155-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. May. 19, 2011)

Opinion

2:08-CV-01155-PMP-PAL.

May 19, 2011


ORDER


The Court having read and considered Defendant/Counterclaimant/Third-Party Plaintiffs Objections to Magistrate Judge Leen's Order Denying in Part Walters Parties' Motion to Conduct Limited Discovery (Doc. #440) filed April 28, 2011, and Plaintiff's Respose in Opposition thereto (Doc. #441) filed May 5, 2011, and finding that Magistrate Judge Leen's Order (Doc. #435) is neither clearly erroneous or contrary to law, and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant/Counterclaimant/Third-Party Plaintiffs Objections to Magistrate Judge Leen's Order Denying in Part Walters Parties' Motion to Conduct Limited Discovery (Doc. #440) are OVERRULED and the Order (Doc. #435) of Magistrate Judge Leen is hereby AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

FSP STALLION 1 v. LUCE

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 19, 2011
2:08-CV-01155-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. May. 19, 2011)
Case details for

FSP STALLION 1 v. LUCE

Case Details

Full title:FSP STALLION 1, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL F. LUCE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 19, 2011

Citations

2:08-CV-01155-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. May. 19, 2011)