From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fryling v. Russ

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 24, 1934
172 A. 729 (N.J. 1934)

Opinion

Argued May 22, 1934 —

Decided May 24, 1934.

For the defendants-appellants, Howard Eastwood.

For the plaintiffs-respondents, French, Richards Bradley ( Floyd H. Bradley).


From an examination of the record in this case it is apparent that there were fact questions presented which were submitted by the trial judge to the jury in a charge that was faultless so far as any question is presented for our determination.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, DEAR, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Fryling v. Russ

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 24, 1934
172 A. 729 (N.J. 1934)
Case details for

Fryling v. Russ

Case Details

Full title:E. LEONARD FRYLING AND HARRY F. FRYLING, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HOWARD…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 24, 1934

Citations

172 A. 729 (N.J. 1934)
172 A. 729