From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frye v. Zaken

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 6, 2024
Civil Action 24-322 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 6, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 24-322

09-06-2024

TARANCE FRYE v. MICHAEL ZAKEN, et al.


ORDER

John M. Younge, J.

AND NOW, this ____day of____, 2024 upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Amended Petition, the Commonwealth's Response, Petitioner's Reply, the other documents filed by the parties, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED and DENIED; and
3. Petitioner has neither shown a denial of a constitutional right, nor established that reasonable jurists would disagree with this court's disposition of his claims. Consequently, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Frye v. Zaken

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 6, 2024
Civil Action 24-322 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Frye v. Zaken

Case Details

Full title:TARANCE FRYE v. MICHAEL ZAKEN, et al.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 6, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 24-322 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 6, 2024)