From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frye v. Zaken

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 4, 2024
24-cv-322-JMY (E.D. Pa. Oct. 4, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-322-JMY

10-04-2024

TARANCE FRYE v. MICHAEL ZAKEN, et al.


ORDER

John Milton Younge Judge

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2024, upon consideration of the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 10), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (ECF No. 18), to which no party has filed an objection, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED and DENIED.
3. Petitioner has neither shown a denial of a constitutional right, nor established that reasonable jurists would disagree with this court's disposition of his claims.
Consequently, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to TRANSMIT (by mail) copies of this Order to Plaintiff at the mailing address that he has identified on the docket for service of court papers. The Clerk of Court is further DIRECTED to mark this matter CLOSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Frye v. Zaken

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 4, 2024
24-cv-322-JMY (E.D. Pa. Oct. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Frye v. Zaken

Case Details

Full title:TARANCE FRYE v. MICHAEL ZAKEN, et al.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 4, 2024

Citations

24-cv-322-JMY (E.D. Pa. Oct. 4, 2024)