From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frye v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Nov 4, 2020
953 N.W.2d 707 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

Summary

concluding counsel "did not breach a duty by in advising ... that the defense of compulsion was unavailable"

Summary of this case from Ockenfels v. State

Opinion

No. 19-0433

11-04-2020

Jeremy Alan FRYE, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa, Respondent-Appellee.

Agnes G. Warutere of Warutere Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Ankeny, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Timothy M. Hau, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904

Jeremy Frye appeals the denial of his application for postconviction relief. AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Frye v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Nov 4, 2020
953 N.W.2d 707 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

concluding counsel "did not breach a duty by in advising ... that the defense of compulsion was unavailable"

Summary of this case from Ockenfels v. State
Case details for

Frye v. State

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY ALAN FRYE, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE OF IOWA…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Nov 4, 2020

Citations

953 N.W.2d 707 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

Ockenfels v. State

Having failed to establish the third element, the compulsion defense was unavailable to him and Ockenfels’…

McCoy v. State

We review a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel de novo. See Lamasters v. State, 821 N.W.2d 856, 862…