From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frye v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 16, 2002
802 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 3D01-2107

Opinion filed January 16, 2002.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Lower Tribunal No. 94-30736. Court for Dade County, Cecilia M. Altonaga, Judge.

David Frye, in proper person. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.


As the State properly concedes, the appellant's motion to clarify illegal sentence should be granted. On remand, the trial court is directed to clarify the following: that the re-sentencing order is nunc pro tunc to the original sentencing date of May 18, 1996; that the sentence should include the sentence for count 7, the severed unlawful possession of a firearm conviction; that all sentences are to run concurrent; and that the appellant did not receive a habitual violent offender sentence as to count 3, the burglary conviction that was overturned on appeal.

Remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Frye v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 16, 2002
802 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Frye v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID FRYE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 16, 2002

Citations

802 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)