From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frye v. Speedway Chevrolet Cadillac

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Aug 10, 2010
315 S.W.3d 786 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. WD71756.

August 10, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Johnson County, Missouri, Jacqueline A. Cook, Judge.

Charles K. Baldwin, Liberty, MO, for respondent.

Kevin D. Case and David J. Roberts, Kansas City, MO, for appellants.

Before Division One: JAMES M. SMART, JR., Presiding Judge, MARK PFEIFFER, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.


ORDER


Speedway Chevrolet Cadillac, Inc. ("Speedway"), Daniel F. Ladd ("Ladd"), the President of Speedway, and Brice Ackerman ("Ackerman"), the General Sales Manager of Speedway, (collectively the "Defendants") appeal from the trial court's order denying Defendants' motion to compel arbitration of Larry Frye's employment related claims. The Defendants contend that a program adopted by Speedway after Larry Frye began employment with Speedway and is a legally enforceable contract. We affirm the trial court's denial of Defendants' motion to compel arbitration. 84.16(b).

This Order has been issued contemporaneously with this Court's Opinion in Kimberly Frye v. Speedway Chevrolet Cadillac, WD 71757. Mr. Frye's motion for consolidation of this case with the aforesaid case was taken with the case and is denied.


Summaries of

Frye v. Speedway Chevrolet Cadillac

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Aug 10, 2010
315 S.W.3d 786 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Frye v. Speedway Chevrolet Cadillac

Case Details

Full title:Larry FRYE, Respondent v. SPEEDWAY CHEVROLET CADILLAC, et al., Appellants

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Aug 10, 2010

Citations

315 S.W.3d 786 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Frye v. Speedway Chevrolet Cadillac

Defendants also appealed the trial court's denial of the motion to compel arbitration in Larry's case. Though…