From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frye v. Madden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2022
2:21-cv-01682-KJM-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01682-KJM-JDP (HC)

06-15-2022

KARLOS FRYE, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ON PETITIONER'S UNTIMELY OBJECTIONS

ECF No. 11

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On March 14, 2022, I recommended that petitioner's amended petition be dismissed without leave as untimely. ECF No. 7. On May 23, 2022, the court adopted the findings and recommendations in full, dismissed the amended petition without leave to amend, and entered judgment accordingly. ECF Nos. 7 & 10. Approximately three weeks later, petitioner filed objections to the March 14, 2022 findings and recommendations. ECF No. 11.

Because this case is now closed, the court takes no action on petitioner's filing. Petitioner is notified that the court will not respond to future filings in this case that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Frye v. Madden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2022
2:21-cv-01682-KJM-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Frye v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:KARLOS FRYE, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 15, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-01682-KJM-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)