From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frye v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 26, 2013
NO. 5:13cv00055 DPM-JTR (E.D. Ark. Apr. 26, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 5:13cv00055 DPM-JTR

04-26-2013

DOYLE DEWAYNE FRYE ADC #115393 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT


ORDER

Respondent has filed a Response (docket entry #8) arguing that Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas claims should be dismissed because: (1) they are all barred by the one-year statute of limitations; (2) his first and second claims do not state cognizable federal habeas claims; (3) all of his claims are procedurally defaulted because he did properly raise them in state court; and (4) alternatively, his second claim was reasonably adjudicated by the Arkansas Supreme Court in his direct appeal. A Reply to the Response would be helpful to resolution of this action.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Petitioner is directed to file, on or before May 24, 2013, a Reply addressing the arguments for dismissal raised in the Response.

____________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Frye v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 26, 2013
NO. 5:13cv00055 DPM-JTR (E.D. Ark. Apr. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Frye v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:DOYLE DEWAYNE FRYE ADC #115393 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Apr 26, 2013

Citations

NO. 5:13cv00055 DPM-JTR (E.D. Ark. Apr. 26, 2013)