From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FRYE v. GRAHAM

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 3, 2010
Civil Case No. 10-cv-00196-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Jun. 3, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 10-cv-00196-REB-KMT.

June 3, 2010


ORDER


The matter comes before the court on the Joint Stipulated Motion For Dismissal With Prejudice of Defendants Officer Graham and Officer Zepeda and For Substitution of Defendant City of Aurora and To Amend Caption [#22] filed June 2, 2010. After reviewing the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted, that defendants, Officer Graham and Officer Zepeda, should be dismissed with prejudice, that the City of Aurora, Colorado should be substituted and joined as a party defendant, and that the case caption should be amended accordingly.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Joint Stipulated Motion For Dismissal With Prejudice of Defendants Officer Graham and Officer Zepeda and For Substitution of Defendant City of Aurora and To Amend Caption [#22] filed June 2, 2010, is GRANTED;

2. That plaintiff's claims against defendants, Officer Graham and Officer Zepeda, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

3. That the City of Aurora, Colorado is SUBSTITUTED and JOINED as a party defendant, and that the case caption is amended accordingly.


Summaries of

FRYE v. GRAHAM

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 3, 2010
Civil Case No. 10-cv-00196-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Jun. 3, 2010)
Case details for

FRYE v. GRAHAM

Case Details

Full title:TRACY A. FRYE, Plaintiff, v. AURORA POLICE OFFICER ALEKSANDER GRAHAM, in…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jun 3, 2010

Citations

Civil Case No. 10-cv-00196-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Jun. 3, 2010)