From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frye v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 19, 2017
Case # 14-CV-6174-FPG (W.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2017)

Opinion

Case # 14-CV-6174-FPG

07-19-2017

ROBERT ERIC FRYE, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


DECISION AND ORDER

By Stipulation and Order dated December 19, 2014, this case was remanded to the Acting Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings. ECF No. 13. On the same day, the Clerk of Court entered Judgment in Plaintiff's favor. ECF No. 14. By Stipulation and Order dated February 9, 2015, Plaintiff's counsel was awarded $5,278.84 in attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 ("EAJA"). Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). In response, the Commissioner indicated that she did not oppose the requested fee award.

Section 406(b) provides:

Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment.
42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1).

The Court must determine whether the fee is reasonable. Wells v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d 367, 372 (2d Cir. 1990). To do so, the Court considers whether: (1) the contingency percentage is within the 25% cap; (2) there has been fraud or overreaching in making the agreement; and (3) the requested amount is so large as to be a windfall to the attorney. Id. (citations omitted).

After reviewing Plaintiff's application, the Court finds that the amount requested does not exceed the statutory 25% cap, there is no evidence of fraud or overreaching, and the amount is not so large as to be a windfall to the attorney. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED under 42 U.S.C § 406(b) in the amount of $19,293.73. The Commissioner shall promptly pay this sum to Plaintiff's counsel. Additionally, as represented in the Motion for Attorney Fees, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to refund to his client the $5,278.84 that he received in attorney fees under EAJA.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 19, 2017

Rochester, New York

/s/_________

HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR.

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Frye v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 19, 2017
Case # 14-CV-6174-FPG (W.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Frye v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ERIC FRYE, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 19, 2017

Citations

Case # 14-CV-6174-FPG (W.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2017)