From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FRYE v. AYERS

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 19, 2008
No. CIV S-99-0628 LKK KJM, DEATH PENALTY CASE (E.D. Cal. May. 19, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-99-0628 LKK KJM, DEATH PENALTY CASE.

May 19, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner applies for reconsideration of this court's May 6, 2008 order. The court recognizes that its modification of the protective order, along the lines of petitioner's apparent request in his May 1 reply brief, did not address the request petitioner made in his original April 16 request for reconsideration. The type of language petitioner seeks was not included in the protective order issued in the Osband case, upon which petitioner relies. Application of the protective order to experts is not a simple matter. Petitioner notes that protections for testifying experts would be limited to matters "that were not part of their testimony." Pet'r's Apr. 16, 2008 Req. for Recon. at 16-17. In his request for reconsideration, petitioner did not propose language for whatever modification he requests. Moreover, it is not apparent that respondent has no objection to the modification petitioner seeks.

To the extent petitioner's May 9, 2008 application for reconsideration is directed to this court, that application is denied.


Summaries of

FRYE v. AYERS

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 19, 2008
No. CIV S-99-0628 LKK KJM, DEATH PENALTY CASE (E.D. Cal. May. 19, 2008)
Case details for

FRYE v. AYERS

Case Details

Full title:JERRY GRANT FRYE, Petitioner, v. ROBERT L. AYERS, Jr., Warden of San…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 19, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-99-0628 LKK KJM, DEATH PENALTY CASE (E.D. Cal. May. 19, 2008)