From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FRYAR v. MEES

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Jun 22, 2005
No. 10-04-00061-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 22, 2005)

Opinion

No. 10-04-00061-CV

Opinion delivered and filed June 22, 2005.

Appeal from the 82nd District Court, Falls County, Texas, Trial Court No. 33,841.

Reversed and remanded.

Before Chief Justice GRAY, Justice VANCE, and Justice REYNA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This appeal concerns a suit for breach of warranty, unlawful repossession and commercially unreasonable sale, violations of the Texas Finance Code, and other causes of action in the sale of a used car. See TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 348.412 (Vernon 1998). Fryar appeals the trial court's granting of summary judgment for Mees. We reverse.

In Fryar's first issue, she contends that the trial court erred in granting final summary judgment though Mees's summary-judgment motion did not address all of Fryar's causes of action. Mees concedes that his motion did not address Fryar's causes of action for unlawful repossession and commercially unreasonable sale or for Finance-Code violations. The trial court erred in granting final summary judgment on all claims. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001). We sustain Fryar's first issue.

Having sustained Fryar's first issue, we reverse the summary judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings.


Summaries of

FRYAR v. MEES

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Jun 22, 2005
No. 10-04-00061-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 22, 2005)
Case details for

FRYAR v. MEES

Case Details

Full title:GLORIA ANN FRYAR, Appellant v. NICHOLAS MEES D/B/A MEES AUTO REPAIR…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: Jun 22, 2005

Citations

No. 10-04-00061-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 22, 2005)