From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FRY v. ESTEP

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 24, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00568-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 24, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00568-WYD-BNB.

August 24, 2006


ORDER


On August 21, 2006, Applicant filed a "Motion to Amend Habeas Application to Delete the Unexhausted Claim No. (3) (B). . . ." Respondents are directed to respond to the Motion within twenty days of the date of the Motion. Applicant is directed to file a reply within fifteen days of the date of the Response if he so desires.

As for Applicant's request for appointment of counsel and for an evidentiary hearing, the requests will be denied as premature. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Respondents shall respond to Applicant's Motion to Amend within twenty days of the date of the Motion. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant shall reply to the Response within fifteen days of the date of the Response if he so desires. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant's request for appointment of counsel and for evidentiary hearing are denied as premature.


Summaries of

FRY v. ESTEP

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 24, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00568-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 24, 2006)
Case details for

FRY v. ESTEP

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT P. FRY, Applicant, v. AL ESTEP, Warden, Limon Correctional…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Aug 24, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00568-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 24, 2006)