From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frucher v. Kaye's Auto Exchange, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 28, 1980
74 A.D.2d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

February 28, 1980


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered March 14, 1979 in Columbia County, which denied plaintiffs' motion for a default judgment and granted the motion of defendant Milroy Chevrolet, Inc., to serve an answer. We are unable to detect any abuse of discretion in Special Term's decision which refused to grant a default judgment to plaintiffs against the codefendant, Milroy Chevrolet, Inc. The delay in answering the complaint was of relatively brief duration. It was satisfactorily explained as arising from the failure of defendant's insurer to receive notice of the action until shortly before the instant motion was made. The existence of potentially meritorious defenses to this negligence action was obvious and the default itself can hardly be characterized as a willful abandonment of the matter. Accordingly, the order appealed from should be affirmed (see Bishop v. Galasso, 67 A.D.2d 753; West v Tracy, 56 A.D.2d 695). Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Mikoll, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Frucher v. Kaye's Auto Exchange, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 28, 1980
74 A.D.2d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Frucher v. Kaye's Auto Exchange, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE FRUCHER et al., Appellants, v. KAYE'S AUTO EXCHANGE, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 28, 1980

Citations

74 A.D.2d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Spickerman v. State

Admittedly, the failure to serve an answer was an oversight, a circumstance which ordinarily would fall into…

Picotte Realty, Inc. v. Aragona

The order should be affirmed. A defendant seeking to vacate a default judgment must demonstrate (1) a…