Opinion
454
Decided July 1, 2002.
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the movant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11(d)(1)(iii) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals.
454
Decided July 1, 2002.
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the movant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11(d)(1)(iii) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals.
Full title:HELENA FROST, Appellant, v. TAUSIK BROTHERS, LLC, et al., Respondents
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jul 1, 2002