From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frost v. Tausik Brothers

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 1, 2002
774 N.E.2d 752 (N.Y. 2002)

Opinion

454

Decided July 1, 2002.


Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the movant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11(d)(1)(iii) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals.


Summaries of

Frost v. Tausik Brothers

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 1, 2002
774 N.E.2d 752 (N.Y. 2002)
Case details for

Frost v. Tausik Brothers

Case Details

Full title:HELENA FROST, Appellant, v. TAUSIK BROTHERS, LLC, et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 1, 2002

Citations

774 N.E.2d 752 (N.Y. 2002)
746 N.Y.S.2d 687
98 N.Y.2d 686