From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frost v. Stalnaker

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Feb 17, 2011
Case Number: 1:09cv662 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:09cv662.

February 17, 2011


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on December 17, 2010 (Doc. 64), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired February 7, 2011, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Plaintiff requested an extension of time to file objections to the Report and Recommendation on January 4, 2011. The Court granted the motion and extended the time of filing objections until February 7, 2011. To this date, plaintiff has not filed any objections or other requests for extension of time.

Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 53) is GRANTED and plaintiffs' motion to amend (Doc. 57) is DENIED. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from the active docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit


Summaries of

Frost v. Stalnaker

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Feb 17, 2011
Case Number: 1:09cv662 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Frost v. Stalnaker

Case Details

Full title:Robert Frost, Plaintiff(s), v. H.C.A. Stalnaker, et. al., Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Feb 17, 2011

Citations

Case Number: 1:09cv662 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 17, 2011)

Citing Cases

Cary v. Mox

Moreover, "[w]hether negligent or deliberate, a violation of an internal prison policy, in and of itself,…