Opinion
19-CV-10992 (CM)
12-03-2019
YVONNE FROST, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK (HRA), et al., Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651 :
On November 7, 2019, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Frost v. New York City (HRA), 1:19-CV-8936, 6 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2019). Plaintiff filed this new pro se case, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the Court. This action is therefore dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the November 7, 2019 order.
The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: December 3, 2019
New York, New York
/s/_________
COLLEEN McMAHON
Chief United States District Judge