From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frost v. Blum, O'Connor

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 26, 1980
409 N.E.2d 942 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued June 4, 1980

Decided June 26, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, CON. G. CHOLAKIS, J.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Clifford A. Royael and Shirley Adelson Siegel of counsel), for appellant.

David L. Posner for Joanne Frost, respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

It is conceded that from the fourth month of her medically verified pregnancy petitioner was entitled to a grant under the Aid to Dependent Children program with respect to her unborn child notwithstanding that she herself was not otherwise eligible for public assistance (cf. Matter of Bates v Toia, 45 N.Y.2d 460). We agree with the courts below that there was no authority under the regulations of the Department of Social Services then in effect (18 N.Y.CRR 352.30) to base the amount of that grant on the pro rata share of the monthly grant for a two-person household prescribed by subdivision 3 of section 131-a of the Social Services Law.

We do not consider and thus intimate no views as to what might be the result under subsequent amendment of the regulation, which has no application to this case.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Frost v. Blum, O'Connor

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 26, 1980
409 N.E.2d 942 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Frost v. Blum, O'Connor

Case Details

Full title:JOANNE FROST, on Behalf of Her Unborn Child, Respondent, v. BARBARA BLUM…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 26, 1980

Citations

409 N.E.2d 942 (N.Y. 1980)
409 N.E.2d 942
431 N.Y.S.2d 469

Citing Cases

Matter of Scott v. Blum

Petitioner De Jonge asserts this regulation conflicts with sections 131 Soc. Serv. and 131-a Soc. Serv. of…

Matter of Jackson v. Blum

"Persons and families determined to be eligible by the application of the standard of need * * * shall…