From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frosco Food Club Plan v. Dennison

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 16, 1959
18 Misc. 2d 241 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

June 16, 1959

Appeal from the Nassau County District Court, KATHLEEN M. KANE, J.

Keilson Keilson ( Joseph Keilson of counsel), for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.


In this action to recover a balance due under a written agreement alleged to have been assumed orally by the defendant, the evidence clearly indicates that the latter bound himself as a principal debtor primarily liable for the obligation here involved. Consequently, his promise does not come within the operation of the Statute of Frauds.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, with $30 costs to the plaintiff, and judgment directed for plaintiff in the sum of $484.15, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Frosco Food Club Plan v. Dennison

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 16, 1959
18 Misc. 2d 241 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Frosco Food Club Plan v. Dennison

Case Details

Full title:FROSCO FOOD CLUB PLAN, INC., Appellant, v. EUGENE DENNISON, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1959

Citations

18 Misc. 2d 241 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
192 N.Y.S.2d 836

Citing Cases

DEVOE RAYNOLDS v. PELL CITY PIPE

Furthermore, it may be that the defendant Terry would be liable, as claimed by the plaintiff, pursuant to an…

Culkin v. Smith

Significant in this connection is the fact that Culkin settled and paid the obligation to the Marine Bank.…