From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Froling v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 14, 2022
No. 27515-21 (U.S.T.C. Sep. 14, 2022)

Opinion

27515-21

09-14-2022

KYLE R. FROLING & ROSE J. FROLING, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

By Order served October 26, 2021, the Court directed petitioners to file an amended petition and to pay the Court's $60.00 filing fee. No response was received from petitioners. By Order of Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction entered August 17, 2022, this case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that petitioners failed to pay the Court's filing fee. The filing fee has since been received. However, petitioners have not filed an amended petition, as previously directed by the Court.

In view of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, on the Court's own motion, the Order of Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction entered August 17, 2022, is vacated and set aside. It is further

ORDERED that the due date by which petitioners shall file an amended petition is extended to October 6, 2022. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this case for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Froling v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 14, 2022
No. 27515-21 (U.S.T.C. Sep. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Froling v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:KYLE R. FROLING & ROSE J. FROLING, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Sep 14, 2022

Citations

No. 27515-21 (U.S.T.C. Sep. 14, 2022)