Opinion
No. 20120381.
2013-04-4
Larry Allen FROISTAD, Jr., Plaintiff and Appellant v. Robyn SCHMALENBERGER, Warden, North Dakota State Penitentiary, Eddy Wilson, Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary, Defendants and Appellees.
Appeal from the District Court of Bowman County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Zane Anderson, Judge. Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for plaintiff and appellant. James D. Gion, State's Attorney, Regent, ND, for defendants and appellees.
Appeal from the District Court of Bowman County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Zane Anderson, Judge.
Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for plaintiff and appellant. James D. Gion, State's Attorney, Regent, ND, for defendants and appellees.
PER CURIAM.
[¶ 1] Larry Froistad appeals a district court order summarily denying his petition for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Froistad argues the State withheld exculpatory evidence and newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial. Froistad sought and was denied post-conviction relief after a full hearing. Denial of Froistad's requested relief was affirmed. Froistad v. State, 2002 ND 52, 641 N.W.2d 86. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). Steen v. State, 2007 ND 123, ¶ 13, 736 N.W.2d 457 (“[M]isuse of process occurs when a post-conviction relief applicant ‘presents a claim for relief which the applicant inexcusably failed to raise either in a proceeding leading to judgment of conviction and sentence or in a previous postconviction proceeding.’ ”) (quotation omitted).