From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frogge v. U S West Communications, Inc.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 26, 1994
863 P.2d 1313 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

90D-300490; CA A70518

On appellant Frogge's petition for reconsideration filed August 11, reconsideration allowed; opinion ( 120 Or. App. 619, 853 P.2d 1323) adhered to November 17, 1993, reconsideration denied April 6, petition for review denied April 26, 1994 ( 319 Or. 36)

Appeal from District Court, Marion County, Paul J. Lipscomb, Judge.

Magar E. Magar, Portland, for petition.

Before De Muniz, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Leeson, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; opinion adhered to.


Plaintiff asks us to reconsider our opinion, 120 Or. App. 619, 853 P.2d 1323 (1993), affirming a judgment against her on the ground that she did not present sufficient evidence of her damages. She argues for the first time that defendant's appellate brief misquoted her expert, and that her expert's testimony, properly quoted, establishes her damages.

The trial court granted a directed verdict for defendant in part on the ground that plaintiff had failed to establish her damages. On appeal, plaintiff failed to show that that ruling was error. Reconsideration is not a forum for making arguments previously neglected. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or. 376, 823 P.2d 956 (1991); Beck v. Fred S. James Co., 53 Or. App. 179, 631 P.2d 798 (1981).

Reconsideration allowed; opinion adhered to.


Summaries of

Frogge v. U S West Communications, Inc.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 26, 1994
863 P.2d 1313 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Frogge v. U S West Communications, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Josephine FROGGE, dba Jay Jay's Doggie Hotel, Appellant, v. U S WEST…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 26, 1994

Citations

863 P.2d 1313 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
863 P.2d 1313

Citing Cases

Rogers v. RGIS, LLP

OTLA reasons that, because ORS 653.055(4) allows for an award of attorney fees to the prevailing party, in…

Mears v. Marshall

Plaintiff also argues that we erred in our interpretation of the express preemption provision of the MDA, 21…