From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fritz v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P
Mar 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-1766 (W.D. La. Mar. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-1766

03-06-2012

CLARENCE ALEXANDER FRITZ FED. REG. #43469-265 v. JOE P. YOUNG, WARDEN


JUDGE MINALDI

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY


JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed previously herein, noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED THAT the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because this court cannot grant the relief requested by petitioner.

Signed in chambers, Lake Charles, Louisiana, on March, 2012.

______________

PATRICIA MINALDI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Fritz v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P
Mar 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-1766 (W.D. La. Mar. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Fritz v. Young

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE ALEXANDER FRITZ FED. REG. #43469-265 v. JOE P. YOUNG, WARDEN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P

Date published: Mar 6, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-1766 (W.D. La. Mar. 6, 2012)