From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fritz v. Charter Township of Comstock

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Mar 17, 2010
No. 08-2578 (6th Cir. Mar. 17, 2010)

Opinion

No. 08-2578.

Filed: March 17, 2010.

BEFORE: RYAN, COLE, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, which was circulated to all active judges of this court, none of whom requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original panel.

The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied. Judge Ryan would grant rehearing for the reasons stated in his dissent.


Summaries of

Fritz v. Charter Township of Comstock

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Mar 17, 2010
No. 08-2578 (6th Cir. Mar. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Fritz v. Charter Township of Comstock

Case Details

Full title:SUE FRITZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF COMSTOCK, A PUBLIC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Mar 17, 2010

Citations

No. 08-2578 (6th Cir. Mar. 17, 2010)