From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fritz v. Allen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Mar 4, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO: 2:13-cv-31 (W.D. La. Mar. 4, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO: 2:13-cv-31

03-04-2015

CLARENCE ALEXANDER FRITZ v. M. ALLEN et al


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, [Doc. #34], and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record;

IT IS ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss be and is hereby GRANTED. The Court notes that, while the instant Report and Recommendation was pending, plaintiff did notify the Court of his most recent change of address. This untimely notice notwithstanding, the record reflects that plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case; therefore, this matter is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, this 4 day of March, 2015.

/s/_________

DONALD E. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Fritz v. Allen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Mar 4, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO: 2:13-cv-31 (W.D. La. Mar. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Fritz v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE ALEXANDER FRITZ v. M. ALLEN et al

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Mar 4, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO: 2:13-cv-31 (W.D. La. Mar. 4, 2015)