From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frison v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Oct 1, 1963
322 F.2d 476 (10th Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 7395.

October 1, 1963.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Alfred A. Arraj, Chief Judge.

G.E. Oppenneer, Denver, Colo. (Grant, Shafroth, Toll McHenrie, Denver, Colo., were with him on the brief), for appellant.

Donald P. MacDonald, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Lawrence M. Henry, U.S. Atty., was with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before LEWIS, HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.


Appellant, having been convicted of an offense against the United States from which judgment no appeal was taken, seeks to have produced at government expense the transcript of the trial proceedings and other documents because he "is going to make a collateral attack upon his conviction pursuant to the provisions of Section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C.A. * * *" The trial court denied the application.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in Prince v. United States, 10 Cir., 312 F.2d 252; Pearson v. United States, 10 Cir., 313 F.2d 868; Lingo v. United States, 10 Cir., 320 F.2d 260.


Summaries of

Frison v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Oct 1, 1963
322 F.2d 476 (10th Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Frison v. United States

Case Details

Full title:William Henry FRISON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Oct 1, 1963

Citations

322 F.2d 476 (10th Cir. 1963)

Citing Cases

Sides v. Tinsley

The application was denied by the state trial court and the judgment was affirmed on appeal. Sides v.…

McKinney v. Wofford

In addition, Petitioner has not shown a need for the transcripts at this time. See Martinez v. United States,…