Fringer v. Kersey Homes, Inc.

Full title: RE: Fringer v. Kersey Homes, Inc.

Court: COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Jul 3, 2018

C.A. No. 9780-VCG (Del. Ch. Jul. 3, 2018)

Opinion

C.A. No. 9780-VCG

07-03-2018

RE: Fringer v. Kersey Homes, Inc.

Dean Campbell, Esquire Law Office of Dean A. Campbell LLC 20175 Office Circle Georgetown, DE 19947 Richard E. Berl, Jr., Esquire Hudson Jones Jaywork & Fisher LLC 34382 Carpenter's Way, Suite 3 Lewes, DE 19958

Sam Glasscock III VICE CHANCELLOR

Dean Campbell, Esquire
Law Office of Dean A. Campbell LLC
20175 Office Circle
Georgetown, DE 19947 Richard E. Berl, Jr., Esquire
Hudson Jones Jaywork & Fisher LLC
34382 Carpenter's Way, Suite 3
Lewes, DE 19958 Dear Counsel:

I have Plaintiff's Motion for Reargument or in the alternative Motion to Amend Memorandum Opinion dated July 2, 2018. No response by Defendants is necessary. Proper grounds for granting a motion for reargument are that the Court, in its decision, has made an error of law or a misapprehension of fact, fundamental to its opinion. Upon review of the Motion, I find that it is without merit and is therefore denied.

The parties should attempt to agree to the appropriate method of administration of a remedy in this case. I will convene an office conference within two weeks concerning the appropriate remedy. To the extent that the foregoing requires an order to take effect, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sincerely,

/s/ Sam Glasscock III

Vice Chancellor cc: Register in Chancery