From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frierson v. Brady

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 17, 2013
518 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-7709

04-17-2013

MARCUS ANTONIO FRIERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M. BRADY, LPN; C. DIXON, LPN; EDWARD L. STAHL, JR., Estate of Dr. Edward L. Stahl, Jr., Estate of Edward L. Stahl, Jr., Unknown heirs of Dr. Edward L. Stahl, Jr., Defendants - Appellees.

Marcus Antonio Frierson, Appellant Pro Se. D. Malloy McEachin, Jr., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (4:09-cv-01314-MGL) Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marcus Antonio Frierson, Appellant Pro Se. D. Malloy McEachin, Jr., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marcus Antonio Frierson appeals the district court's judgment entered for the Defendants following a jury trial on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, Frierson's motion for production of transcripts is denied, and we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Frierson v. Brady

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 17, 2013
518 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Frierson v. Brady

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS ANTONIO FRIERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M. BRADY, LPN; C…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 17, 2013

Citations

518 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2013)