From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedrich v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 7, 2000
767 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 2000)

Opinion

No. SC96852

September 7, 2000

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance.

Fourth District — Case No. 4D98-0891.

(Palm Beach County).

Richard W. Springer and Catherine Mazzullo of Springer Springer, Palm Springs, Florida, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Celia Terenzio, Assistant Attorney General, Bureau Chief, and Robert R. Wheeler, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Respondent.


We have for review a decision on the following question certified to be of great public importance:

DOES LOVE V. GARCIA, 634 So.2d 158 (Fla. 1994), APPLY IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS WHERE BLOOD ALCOHOL TEST RESULTS ARE OFFERED AS PROOF TO ESTABLISH AN ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE, IF THE BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTS WERE ADMINISTERED BY HOSPITAL PERSONNEL FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT PURPOSES?

Friedrich v. State, 743 So.2d 1125, 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We answered an identical certified question affirmatively in Baber v. State, No. SC96010 (Fla. Aug. 31, 2000). Because the district court's decision is consistent with our decision in Baber, we approve the decision below.

We decline to address additional issues raised by petitioner as being outside the scope of the certified question and decision below.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Friedrich v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 7, 2000
767 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 2000)
Case details for

Friedrich v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOY FRIEDRICH, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 7, 2000

Citations

767 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 2000)

Citing Cases

Tucker v. Dept. of Corrections

See, e.g., Major League Baseball v. Morsani, 790 So.2d 1071, 1080 n. 26 (Fla. 2001) ("We decline to address…

Seagrave v. State

We decline to address the second issue raised by Seagrave because it is outside the scope of the certified…