From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedmann v. Internal Revenue Serv.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 11, 2023
3:23-CV-05075-TL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 11, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-CV-05075-TL

10-11-2023

MICHAEL FRIEDMANN, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING ENTRY OF DEFAULT

Tana Lin United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Michael Friedmann's motion for entry of default. Dkt. No. 17. Plaintiff asserts that entry of default is appropriate because Defendants were served with process and have not answered within 21 days. Id. at 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, the United States and its agencies, officers, or employees have 60 days to respond to service of process, not 21 days. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(2)-(3). As such, Plaintiff's request for entry of default is premature. The Court therefore DENIES Plaintiff's motion without prejudice. Plaintiff may renew his motion if any properly served defendant fails to respond within the time proscribed by rule.


Summaries of

Friedmann v. Internal Revenue Serv.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 11, 2023
3:23-CV-05075-TL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Friedmann v. Internal Revenue Serv.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL FRIEDMANN, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Oct 11, 2023

Citations

3:23-CV-05075-TL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 11, 2023)