From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedman v. Odora Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 12, 1947
273 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

December 12, 1947.

Present — Peck, P.J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.


We find that the three defenses attacked are insufficient in law. (See Pollitz v. Wabash Railroad Co., No. 1, 150 App. Div. 709; Pollitz v. Wabash Railroad Co., No. 2, 150 App. Div. 715. ) Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by granting plaintiff's cross motion to dismiss said defenses and by denying examination of plaintiff before trial on item 8 in said order and as so modified affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Friedman v. Odora Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 12, 1947
273 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Friedman v. Odora Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL FRIEDMAN, Appellant, v. ODORA COMPANY, INC., et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 12, 1947

Citations

273 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Citing Cases

Mt. Zion Baptist Church v. Brown

This counterclaim for malicious prosecution and for abuse of process is insufficient in that it fails to…